Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jeff Putney: > > I do not argue that having a nice fsck sooner than later is fine, but > > I question the usefulness of repeating reminders. Chris Mason and > > other developers possibly working on the fsck should know by now, > > that you want it. So its unlikely that "I want it too" is going to > > change anything. > > I haven't gotten the impression that Chris is quite that tone deaf, or > inconsiderate of the opinions of the community at large. And the > discussion you are commenting on was about releasing the source code, > not the completed tool. I don't think anyone is saying that Chris > needs to work harder and finish it faster. What we are saying is that > it would be better for the progress of btrfs in general if the > development of fsck were done in an open way, and available for others > to contribute to. The main problem with your statement of "Chris > Mason and other developers..." is that there does not appear to be any > other developers at all. That's what we'd most like to see changed. Fair enough, but once again you are repeating that wish. I pretty much bet that Chris Mason is aware of this wish of yours and other people already and the reasons for that wish. I has been at least expressed for a dozen times on this thread. So again what is another dozen of times trying to achieve? This all reminds my of childs that ask their parents when they will arrive every 10 seconds. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
