Re: btrfs root + mount subvolid=0 problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/10/11 23:09, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:

> 3.0.4 is considered old already? Wow, 3.1 is not even out yet

I think the essential difference is that none of the btrfs
work gets pushed back to the stable kernel releases, it only
ever ends up in the RC's for new kernels (as it's still very
much experimental and under development).

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux