File compression control, again.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

So, it makes sense to keep the compression on by default
and with LZO many people are going there.

But, I want to create a database on a compressed btrfs filesystem
which is seek-heavy rather than throughput-heavy
and I really want to turn the compression off just for that database
(smaller I/O reads, more precise cache usage).

Maintenance nightmare that Miguel mentioned
( http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/1665/focus=1669 )
isn't really a problem as I'm going to automatically set the flags
from the program, just before opening the database.

Looking at "fs/btrfs/ioctl.h" I don't see any way to to this.
Subvolume compression control isn't working either from what I heard
(cf. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=126635
     http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/6237/ ).

Am I right that fine-grained compression control is no longer supported by btrfs?
If so, I would like to vote for it to be added.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux