Re: Inefficient storing of ISO images with compress=lzo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 10:53 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Maciej Marcin Piechotka wrote:
> > I've noticed that:
> > 
> >  - with x86-64 Fedora 15 DVD install images:
> >    - du -sh <ROOT VOLUME> was 36 GB
> >    - btrfs df | grep -i data have shown over 40 GB used
> >  - without
> >    - du -sh <ROOT VOLUME> is 34 GB
> >    - btrfs df | grep -i data have shown less then 34 GB used
> > 
> > It seems that iso files are considered compressable while they may not be (and penalty is severe - 3x).
> > 
> 
> With compress option specified, btrfs will try to compress the file, at most
> 128K at one time, and if the compressed result is not smaller, the file will
> be marked as uncompressable.
> 
> I just tried with Fedora-14-i386-DVD.iso, and the first 896K is compressed,
> with a compress ratio about 71.7%, and the remaining data is not compressed.
> 
> --
> Li Zefan

Just a question from person who don't know how btrfs operates - what if
the beginning of file is well compressable and the rest is not?

In any case the compression was my uneducated guess where is missing
4GB.

Regards

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux