Re: Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 13:42 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
> <uzytkownik2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 05:16 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Felix Blanke <felixblanke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > I'm using btrfs since one year now and it's quite fast. I don't feel any
> >> > differences to other filesystems. Never tried a benchmark but for my daily
> >> > work it's nice.
> >>
> >> Your workload must be light :)
> >>
> >
> > I recently repeatedly rsync whole partitions (>30GB) without ill
> > effects. (ok - first sync took whole 1s).
> 
> Wait, you mean you sync 30GB data to another partition in one second?
> It should not be possible for single HDD no matter what the filesystem
> is. Unless you're using SSD or many HDD in raid.
> 

You misparse the sentence. First sync took 1s after rsync and next were
much faster. 

Regards

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux