Hi, On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:32:45PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > I think we don't need to fetch the inode size in advance. :-P. yes, the value is not used and rewritten a few lines below anyway. Please send a patch with proper header and signed-off line to be accepted. david > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c > index e7872e4..f8ad957 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c > @@ -1698,7 +1698,7 @@ static int find_desired_extent(struct inode > *inode, loff_t *offset, int origin) > u64 lockend = i_size_read(inode); > u64 start = *offset; > u64 orig_start = *offset; > - u64 len = i_size_read(inode); > + u64 len; > u64 last_end = 0; > int ret = 0; > > > Thanks, > -Jeff > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
