Re: Rename BTRfs to MuchSlowerFS ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:23:23PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> >   That's because dpkg is known for using (f)sync very heavily.  btrfs
> >honours the sync request in all cases, so it's much much slower than
> >ext3, which doesn't.
> 
> Hmm, is it really the case with ext3/ext4 (ignoring fsync in some cases)?
> 
> Sounds like a bug in ext3/ext4 then.
> 
> Is it documented anywhere where ext3/ext4 would just silently ignore fsync?

They don't.  Unteil recently ext3 and reiserfs would not flush the
disk caches unless enabled by a mount option, but even that has recently
been fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux