Aren't the subjects like "[PATCH" and "[GIT" specifically so people can filter the messages how they see fit? On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi list, > > Could it be considered to create a low-volume, "user-oriented" mailing-list > that wouldn't spit an email for each and every git pull or patch, which are of > interest to developpers only, and of no interest at all for users ? > > I personally am in need of information about BTRFS, i.e. new features, > pitfalls, bugs, important fixes or "when will btrfsck be available ?", but I've > already unsubscribed (and then re-subscribed...) twice to this list, annoyed > by the point to which it was spamming my mailbox with information among which > 99% is of no interest to me, although 1% is very interesting :-} > > -- > Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E > > Avant qu'une personne n'étudie le Zen, les montagnes sont les montagnes, > les eaux sont les eaux. Après un premier aperçu de la vérité du Zen, les > montagnes ne sont plus les montagnes, les eaux ne sont plus les eaux. > Après l'éveil, les montagnes sont de nouveau les montagnes, les eaux de > nouveau les eaux. > -- Kôan Zen > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
