While debugging a different issue I noticed that we were always reserving space when we tried to use our truncate block rsv's. This is because they didn't have a ->size value, so use_block_rsv just assumes there is nothing reserved and it does a reserve_metadata_bytes. This is because btrfs_check_block_rsv() doesn't actually add to the size of the block rsv. That seems to be the right thing to do so set ->size to the minimum truncate size we need, since we will always only refill to that size anyway, and this way everything works out correctly. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 6e79a76..0ee0677 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -3557,6 +3557,7 @@ void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) btrfs_orphan_del(NULL, inode); goto no_delete; } + rsv->size = min_size; btrfs_i_size_write(inode, 0); @@ -6519,6 +6520,7 @@ static int btrfs_truncate(struct inode *inode) rsv = btrfs_alloc_block_rsv(root); if (!rsv) return -ENOMEM; + rsv->size = min_size; /* * 1 for the truncate slack space -- 1.7.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
