Re: processes stuck in llseek

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Mitch Harder's message of 2011-08-18 11:40:17 -0400:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Dan Merillat wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Dan Merillat's message of 2011-08-15 23:59:50 -0400:
> >>
> >>> Dan Carpenter sent a patch for this, I'll get it queued up for rc3.
> >>
> >> Can you send it?  I'd like to test it to see if it fixes my system.
> >
> > Here it is.
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131176036219732&w=2
> >
> 
> Doesn't this patch rely on Josef's SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA patch set which
> isn't in the kernel yet?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=130927580606177&w=2

It does, but the hang was reported on 3.1-rc1, which does have Josef's
code.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux