Re: [PATCH] Re: [btrfs-progs integration] incorrect argument checking for "btrfs sub snap -r"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:45:40AM +0200, Andreas Philipp wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>  
> Hi,
>  
> You are right. Some time ago I have already sent a patch for this. Hugo,
> can you please integrate it?

   I'm at a cricket match right now (India 224, England 122/0), so I
can't do much today, but I should get time tomorrow.

   Hugo.

> Thanks,
> Andreas Philipp
>  
> [PATCH] check number of args for btrfs sub snap correctly
>  
> Check whether there are the right number of arguments (exatly 2 without
> the flag -r) in the subcommand handler for the btrfs subvolume snapshot
> command.
>  
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Philipp <philipp.andreas@xxxxxxxxx>
> - ---
>  btrfs_cmds.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  
> diff --git a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
> index da5bd91..42c82f8 100644
> - --- a/btrfs_cmds.c
> +++ b/btrfs_cmds.c
> @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)
>              return 1;
>          }
>      }
> - -    if (argc - optind < 2) {
> +    if (argc - optind != 3) {
>          fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n");
>          free(argv);
>          return 1;
>  
> - --   
> 1.7.3.4
>  
>  
>  
> On 11.08.2011 06:30, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:     
> > Hi, Hugo,
> >
> > I built your for-chris branch, and ran 'btrfs sub snap' command.
> > Then, I encountered following error message.
> >
> > # btrfs sub snap Dir-1 Dir-2
> > Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot
> >
> > commit:8b4c2a22bff85f86af44587973c8da8c29a67ffc is wrong, I think.
> >
> > (2011/07/01 21:55), Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> >> 2011-07-01 11:42:23 +0100, Hugo Mills:
> >> [...]
> >>>>> diff --git a/btrfs.c b/btrfs.c
> >>>>> index e117172..b50c58a 100644
> >>>>> --- a/btrfs.c
> >>>>> +++ b/btrfs.c
> >>>>> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static struct Command commands[] = {
> >>>>> /*
> >>>>> avoid short commands different for the case only
> >>>>> */
> >>>>> - { do_clone, 2,
> >>>>> + { do_clone, -2,
> >>>>> "subvolume snapshot", "[-r] <source> [<dest>/]<name>\n"
> >>>>> "Create a writable/readonly snapshot of the subvolume <source> with\n"
> >>>>> "the name <name> in the <dest> directory.",
> >>>>> diff --git a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
> >>>>> index 1d18c59..3415afc 100644
> >>>>> --- a/btrfs_cmds.c
> >>>>> +++ b/btrfs_cmds.c
> >>>>> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)
> >>>>> return 1;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> - if (argc - optind < 2) {
> >>>>> + if (argc - optind != 2) {
> >>>>> fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n");
> >>>>> free(argv);
> >>>>> return 1;
> >>>>>
> >>>> Thanks for having another look at this. You are perfectly right. Should
> >>>> we patch my patch or should I rework a corrected version? What do you
> >>>> think Hugo?
> >>> Could you send a follow-up patch with just the second hunk, please?
> >>> I screwed up the process with this (processing patches too quickly to
> >>> catch the review), and I've already published the patch with the first
> >>> hunk, above, into the for-chris branch.
> >> Hugo, not sure what you mean nor whom you're talking to, but I
> >> can certainly copy-paste the second hunk from above here:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
> >> index 1d18c59..3415afc 100644
> >> --- a/btrfs_cmds.c
> >> +++ b/btrfs_cmds.c
> >> @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)
> >> return 1;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> - if (argc - optind < 2) {
> >> + if (argc - optind != 2) {
> > I think that '3' is correct.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tsutomu
> >
> >> fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n");
> >> free(argv);
> >> return 1;
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Stephane
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>  
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOQ3qTAAoJEJIcBJ3+XkgiYTsP/jS8jZoQQoVzpLClfQ4+xIbh
> T1DLiEsu92fy+vxRSEUiFpSUcNlv6qfczwlOwmzWpWk/Cs01RP/XzBPAQc8qqZDy
> JcEHq1Iteix9r9f7kMw2kA2UuRXrtuEiKjAYAOzp8OFoWHLB+S8yV1ajsRa9THOX
> wZ+8wUkNuBfNFjJmwtirNpU0XJwm2QHVAI9n+7jj9asNVedY5tt6vw0YtFVpy2zS
> FxUmGVoo+9+BAEiYkpZ9uvtXUNLojTwyFjMwbH4QAzJWrLTrMhXlj+SRS52mKt9Z
> +Sr71QcIdhy+bb4oBDCjwB1SV9qyAoHTUs1yETzNRPAUgdnX41gZ6q/FYBDplmwZ
> wLNiIa5MjO63SMN32CzLPQn/WbCzWIuGFkoYaBPYQu1ig7xZ3GulCmzhOqWMRfLn
> FcN9GKF/LDcjaey9eTtgrZSp+Q+lRgsHbgg/2aMjZiGMYjOq/+EcFWXA9JfHQqSo
> anQJU9WyUd4eO0ZYFMdRYeH81/+U6UktQVViQF4G9KbV3lbu3WQHhbbdFe2i7FXH
> hWhaUdSEd6JmdKQWgqlV5XWo0hgMLO04oP8S5V03zEH6n5J4YU1wHDpZvsZTQbe8
> 3+k0far4o48GbcjUrMeRBkEuJiMOjNIHBXhjx5IAWkFGAQXvU29VA0IJ/XLFKjLA
> 0RhnC+XwTuaMSTYDzdxP
> =oQbK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
      --- Normaliser unix c'est comme pasteuriser le Camembert ---       
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux