Re: “bio too big” regression and silent data corruption in 3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug  7, 2011, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> tl;dr version: 3.0 produces “bio too big” dmesg entries and silently
> corrupts data in “meta-raid1/data-single” configurations on disks with
> different max_hw_sectors, where 2.6.38 worked fine.

FWIW, I just got the same problem with 2.6.38.  No idea how I hadn't hit
it before, but it's not a 3.0 regression, just a regular (but IMHO very
serious) bug.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux