Re: space cache generation (...) does not match inode (...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/08/2011 08:17 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 08/06/2011 10:16 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> I've always gotten space cache generation warnings, but some time
>>> after 3.0 they started going nuts.  I get:
>>>
>>> space cache generation (14667727114112179905) does not match inode (154185)
>>>
>>> and other similar messages (with a huge number and a smaller number)
>>> at rates higher than one message per ms.  They don't happen
>>> constantly, but they come in bursts big enough to fill my log buffer.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah sorry that's going to happen when you first switch to 3.0.  We
>> switched the space cache stuff over to using the normal checksumming
>> code so all old space cache is going to look invalid.  This is nothing
>> to worry about, it will just end up discarded and re-generated.  Thanks,
> 
> Can you put in a rate limit and make the message less alarming?
> There's enough log spam from it that I can't see anything else in my
> log.
> 

Yeah I'll do that now, thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux