Re: corruption. notreelog has no effect? anything else to try?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> does btrfsck -s1 complete without error? 
> If yes, you can try btrfs-select-super.
> [snip]
> if there's something mentioning "log", I'd try btrfs-zero-log first.

`btrfsck -s1 /dev/sda4` gave errors too. 
So i skipped to running btrfs-zero-log. It ran without errors.
But running btrfsck again still gave the same errors.

So i went back and tried btrfs-select-super...

# ./btrfs-select-super -s1 /dev/sda4
using SB copy 1, bytenr 67108864

After this i tried mounting and it worked for all subvolumes!
I am ever so grateful for your help Fajar.
 
Unfortunately I didn't try mounting after the btrfs-zero-log so i don't
know if it or btrfs-select-super was actually the cure.

Knowing very little about zero-log and select-super should i continue
using my laptop like normal now?
Or is this filesystem still considered corrupt and i should backup and
format it all from scratch?


~mck


-- 
“Don’t worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any
good, you’ll have to ram them down people’s throats.” - Howard Aiken 
| http://semb.wever.org | http://sesat.no
| http://tech.finn.no       | Java XSS Filter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux