Re: raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/11/2011 08:22 PM, krzf83@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I wanted to confirm that btrfs will continue to work on raid1 when one
of devices will be gone.

dd if=/dev/null of=img0 bs=1 seek=2G
dd if=/dev/null of=img1 bs=1 seek=2G
mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 img0 img1
losetup /dev/loop1 img0
losetup /dev/loop2 img1
mkdir dir
mount -t btrfs /dev/loop1 dir
btrfs device scan
mount -t btrfs /dev/loop1 dir
echo abc>  dir/a.txt
umount dir
losetup -d /dev/loop2
btrfs device scan
mount -t btrfs /dev/loop1 dir
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop1,
        missing codepage or other error
        In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
        dmesg | tail  or so

am I missing some nuance?

Yeah you need to mount -o degraded.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux