Re: Memory leak?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Stephane Chazelas's message of 2011-07-09 16:36:50 -0400:
> 2011-07-09 13:25:00 -0600, cwillu:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Stephane Chazelas
> > <stephane_chazelas@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 2011-07-08 11:06:08 -0400, Chris Mason:
> > > [...]
> > >> I would do two things.  First, I'd turn off compress_force.  There's no
> > >> explicit reason for this, it just seems like the mostly likely place for
> > >> a bug.
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I couldn't reproduce it with compress_force turned off, the
> > > inode_cache reached 600MB but never stayed high.
> > >
> > > Not using compress_force is not an option for me though
> > > unfortunately.
> > 
> > Disabling compression doesn't decompress everything that's already compressed.
> 
> Yes. But the very issue here is that I get this problem when I
> copy data onto an empty drive. If I don't enable compression
> there, it simply doesn't fit. In that very case, support for
> compression is the main reason why I use brtfs here.
> 

Great, we're on the right track.  Does it trigger with mount -o compress
instead of mount -o compress_force?

This is very likely to be a bug in compress_force, so the extra
verification will help.

-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux