On Thursday 30 of June 2011 23:19:02 Hugo Mills wrote: > After a reorganisation of patches, and sending a bunch of them to > Chris, I've also updated the integration branch to match that. It's > available from: > > http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ > integration-20110630 > > The shortlog of 17 patches in this branch beyond the ones I've sent > to Chris is below. > > Hugo. Is there a reason why my patch for compilation errors (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg10965.html) isn't integrated? Without it, I can't compile btrfs-progs with new gcc (4.6.0 20110429): volumes.c: In function ‘btrfs_alloc_data_chunk’: volumes.c:891:6: error: variable ‘physical’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable] cc1: all warnings being treated as errors Regards, Hubert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
