Re: [btrfs-transacti] & btrfs-endio-wri] - WAS: Re: [btrfs-delalloc-]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/30/2011 09:13 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:12 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
On 06/29/2011 08:14 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Ok - I upgrade to 2.6.39-2 but it is seems to all things get worse.
Now I see [btrfs-transacti]&   btrfs-endio-wri] 80-100% all the time and
io performance looks like lower then before.

Our scribe daemon in state D most of the time with half of a normal
load. Only kernel was changed.

Any performance tune recommendation?


Can you get sysrq+w while this problem is happening so we can see whats
going on?  Thanks,

I attached sysrq+w. Hope it helps.


Heh so it just looks like you are writing a bunch of stuff, that's not
particularly helpful.  What does this program do generically?  How full
is your fs?  Do you have snapshots/subvolumes?  If so how many?  Thanks,

I found what my btrfs partition now is really slow. Something wrong happend. I try on 2.6.32 and 2.6.39 - same result. It is because partition is almost full?

I run a simple cycle to clean some old files:
for i in `cat /tmp/delit`; do rm -f $i ; done

And it is takes about 5-10 second per file to delete.
I get sysrq+w while rm is work - it is attached.

--
Best regards,
Proskurin Kirill

Attachment: dmesg.rm
Description: application/vnd.rn-realmedia


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux