Re: parent transid verify failures on 2.6.39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the reply. copied the patch from the line "diff...." onward 
did a fresh kernel tree and got the following (same on 2.6.39-r1 and r2)

localhost linux# patch -p1 --dry-run --verbose < disk-io.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|index c650a1d..53e330e 100644
|--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
|+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
--------------------------
Patching file fs/btrfs/disk-io.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 281.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 296.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 328.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 338.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 360.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2012.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 2631.
done


A perfect patch job if I say so :)

any other ideas are welcome 

Dan Witzel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux