Op 15-06-11 12:34, Hugo Mills schreef: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Seems that currently none of the sysfs are created any more, so just >> remove sysfs support entirely. >> >> Fixes compiling warnings in 3.0rc3 > I would actually like to retain sysfs support -- the current > entries may not be used (or useful, or in the right place, or even > visible these days), but there's plenty of things that could and > should go in sysfs from btrfs. > > So, please do remove the unwanted/unused file entries, but could > you leave the sysfs file itself, and the (limited) bits that create > the btrfs subdir? Otherwise, I'm going to be putting it all back in > this weekend when I get the time to revisit Goffredo's old sysfs > patch... Currently sysfs.c is just 2 function calls, rest is unused, so I'll wait then. Will in_sysfs in struct btrfs_root be used again? Currently it's not used but only assigned zero. ~Maarten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
