On Friday, June 10, 2011 08:00:17 AM David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:28:09PM +0800, Li Dongyang wrote:
> > --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct btrfs_device {
> > int running_pending;
> > u64 generation;
> >
> > + int discard;
>
> can you pick a better name? this does not describe that it's the
> capability of the device, but rather 'do a discard'.
I feel the same, I picked the name because there was btrfs_device->barriers,
and it was removed in commit c3b9a62c8f932f32a733d6b628f61f3f28345727
>
> something like has_discard, can_discard, has_trim, etc
>
> > int writeable;
> > int in_fs_metadata;
> > int missing;
>
> otherwise the patch looks good (and matches my view how to do it). I
> will test it eventually.
Thanks a lot, I'll resend this this a proper name.
>
>
> david
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
