Re: [PATCH][v2] btrfs: introduce rescue=onlyfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7/21/20 1:16 PM, David Sterba wrote:

> > No, you're not the only one. Changelog points to 'skipbg' as poor naming
> > choice but 'onlyfs' is IMHO just as bad because it's supposed to be used
> > by users so the naming need to take that into account.
>
> I'm not married to the name, I think its awful but I had no better ideas nor
> suggestions from the last time I posted, tho I'm partial to
> rescue=allthefuckingthings.  However I'm fine with rescue=max also, is that
> everybody's favorite?  Thanks,

Or just rescue?

And then rescue= to specifically list the trees that are to be
ignored? Separated by comma or colon or whatever?


-- 
Chris Murphy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux