On 7/17/20 3:12 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
When running tests like generic/013 on test device with btrfs quota
enabled, it can normally lead to data leakage, detected at unmount time:
BTRFS warning (device dm-3): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 4096
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 16386 at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4142 close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
RIP: 0010:close_ctree+0x1dc/0x323 [btrfs]
Call Trace:
btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110
kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs]
deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0
deactivate_super+0x40/0x50
cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190
__cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
task_work_run+0x64/0xb0
__prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0
__syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
---[ end trace caf08beafeca2392 ]---
BTRFS error (device dm-3): qgroup reserved space leaked
[CAUSE]
In the offending case, the offending operations are:
2/6: writev f2X[269 1 0 0 0 0] [1006997,67,288] 0
2/7: truncate f2X[269 1 0 0 48 1026293] 18388 0
The following sequence of events could happen after the writev():
CPU1 (writeback) | CPU2 (truncate)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
btrfs_writepages() |
|- extent_write_cache_pages() |
|- Got page for 1003520 |
| 1003520 is Dirty, no writeback |
| So (!clear_page_dirty_for_io()) |
| gets called for it |
|- Now page 1003520 is Clean. |
| | btrfs_setattr()
| | |- btrfs_setsize()
| | |- truncate_setsize()
| | New i_size is 18388
|- __extent_writepage() |
| |- page_offset() > i_size |
|- btrfs_invalidatepage() |
|- Page is clean, so no qgroup |
callback executed
This means, the qgroup reserved data space is not properly released in
btrfs_invalidatepage() as the page is Clean.
[FIX]
Instead of checking the dirty bit of a page, call
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() unconditionally in btrfs_invalidatepage().
As qgroup rsv are completely binded to the QGROUP_RESERVED bit of
io_tree, not binded to page status, thus we won't cause double freeing
anyway.
Fixes: 0b34c261e235 ("btrfs: qgroup: Prevent qgroup->reserved from going subzero")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
I don't understand how this is ok. We can call invalidatepage via memory
pressure, so what if we have started the write and have an ordered extent
outstanding, and then we call into invalidate page and now unconditionally drop
the qgroup reservation, even tho we still need it for the ordered extent. Am I
missing something here? Thanks,
Josef
