On 7/13/20 6:50 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[PROBLEM]
Before this patch, when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails, we free all
reserved space of the changeset.
For example:
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, 0, SZ_1M);
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, SZ_1M, SZ_1M);
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, changeset, SZ_2M, SZ_1M);
If the last btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() failed, it will release all [0,
3M) range.
This behavior is kinda OK for now, as when we hit -EDQUOT, we normally
go error handling and need to release all reserved ranges anyway.
But this also means the following call is not possible:
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data();
if (ret == -EDQUOT) {
/* Do something to free some qgroup space */
ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data();
}
As if the first btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails, it will free all
reserved qgroup space.
[CAUSE]
This is because we release all reserved ranges when
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() fails.
[FIX]
This patch will implement a new function, qgroup_unreserve_range(), to
iterate through the ulist nodes, to find any nodes in the failure range,
and remove the EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED bits from the io_tree, and decrease
the extent_changeset::bytes_changed, so that we can revert to previous
status.
This allows later patches to retry btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() if EDQUOT
happens.
Suggested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
---
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Josef
