Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: avoid possible signal interruption for btrfs_drop_snapshot() on relocation tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/8/20 6:00 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[BUG]
There is a bug report about bad signal timing could lead to read-only
fs during balance:

   BTRFS info (device xvdb): balance: start -d -m -s
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 73001861120 flags metadata
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 12236 extents, stage: move data extents
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 71928119296 flags data
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 3 extents, stage: move data extents
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): found 3 extents, stage: update data pointers
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): relocating block group 60922265600 flags metadata
   BTRFS: error (device xvdb) in btrfs_drop_snapshot:5505: errno=-4 unknown
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): forced readonly
   BTRFS info (device xvdb): balance: ended with status: -4

[CAUSE]
The direct cause is the -EINTR from the following call chain when a
fatal signal is pending:

  relocate_block_group()
  |- clean_dirty_subvols()
     |- btrfs_drop_snapshot()
        |- btrfs_start_transaction()
           |- btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_refill()
              |- btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()
                 |- __reserve_metadata_bytes()
                    |- wait_reserve_ticket()
                       |- prepare_to_wait_event();
                       |- ticket->error = -EINTR;

Normally this behavior is fine for most btrfs_start_transaction()
callers, as they need to catch the fatal signal and exit asap.

However to balance, especially for the clean_dirty_subvols() case, we're
already doing cleanup works, such -EINTR from btrfs_drop_snapshot()
could cause a lot of unexpected problems.

 From the mentioned forced read-only, to later balance error due to half
dropped reloc trees.

[FIX]
Fix this problem by using btrfs_join_transaction() if
btrfs_drop_snapshot() is called from relocation context.

As btrfs_join_transaction() won't wait full tickets, it won't get
interrupted from signal.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Josef



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux