On 7/8/20 2:24 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
[PROBLEM]
There are known problem related to how btrfs handles qgroup reserved
space.
One of the most obvious case is the the test case btrfs/153, which do
fallocate, then write into the preallocated range.
btrfs/153 1s ... - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad)
--- tests/btrfs/153.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.068965341 +0800
+++ xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad 2020-07-01 20:24:40.730000089 +0800
@@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
QA output created by 153
+pwrite: Disk quota exceeded
+/mnt/scratch/testfile2: Disk quota exceeded
+/mnt/scratch/testfile2: Disk quota exceeded
Silence is golden
...
(Run 'diff -u xfstests-dev/tests/btrfs/153.out xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/153.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
[CAUSE]
Since commit c6887cd11149 ("Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to"),
we always reserve space no matter if it's COW or not.
Such behavior change is mostly for performance, and reverting it is not
a good idea anyway.
For preallcoated extent, we reserve qgroup data space for it already,
and since we also reserve data space for qgroup at buffered write time,
it needs twice the space for us to write into preallocated space.
This leads to the -EDQUOT in buffered write routine.
And we can't follow the same solution, unlike data/meta space check,
qgroup reserved space is shared between data/meta.
The EDQUOT can happen at the metadata reservation, so doing NODATACOW
check after qgroup reservation failure is not a solution.
[FIX]
To solve the problem, we don't return -EDQUOT directly, but every time
we got a -EDQUOT, we try to flush qgroup space by:
- Flush all inodes of the root
NODATACOW writes will free the qgroup reserved at run_dealloc_range().
However we don't have the infrastructure to only flush NODATACOW
inodes, here we flush all inodes anyway.
- Wait ordered extents
This would convert the preallocated metadata space into per-trans
metadata, which can be freed in later transaction commit.
- Commit transaction
This will free all per-trans metadata space.
Also we don't want to trigger flush too racy, so here we introduce a
per-root mutex to ensure if there is a running qgroup flushing, we wait
for it to end and don't start re-flush.
Fixes: c6887cd11149 ("Btrfs: don't do nocow check unless we have to")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Josef
