On 7.07.20 г. 18:42 ч., Josef Bacik wrote: > v1->v2: > - Adjusted a comment in may_commit_transaction. > - Fixed one of the intermediate patches to properly update ->reclaim_size. > > We've had two different things in place to reserve data and metadata space, > because generally speaking data is much simpler. However the data reservations > still suffered from the same issues that plagued metadata reservations, you > could get multiple tasks racing in to get reservations. This causes problems > with cases like write/delete loops where we should be able to fill up the fs, > delete everything, and go again. You would sometimes race with a flusher that's > trying to unpin the free space, take it's reservations, and then it would fail. > > Fix this by moving the data reservations under the metadata ticketing > infrastructure. This gets rid of that problem, and simplifies our enospc code > more by consolidating it into a single path. Thanks, > > Josef > > What branch is this basedd off? It's not applying on current misc-next.
