Hi Zygo, Thanks for the extensive details about the data-set and how the environment is set up and tests are executed. I'll try to create some windows raw disk images for testing and follow your test environment setup as much as possible. Performance numbers are really interesting between bees, duperemove and dduper! As you mentioned previously, dduper is more like poc and I didn't spend much time in testing with different data sets. Mostly created few GB files with `dd urandom` and tested them. I guess that is why it performs better with files that are entirely duplicate and small extents :-) Let me spend some time investigating these issues, I'm pretty sure dduper can be made a little bit more reliable that its current form. Reg compressed file system tests, will check this after resolving poor disk-space issues on non-compressed filesystems. thanks! ---- Cheers, Lakshmipathi.G http://www.giis.co.in https://www.webminal.org
