Re: [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: Increment device corruption error in case of checksum error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/07/2020 14:41, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Now that btrfs_io_bio have access to btrfs_device we can safely
> increment the device corruption counter on error. There is one notable
> exception - repair bios for raid. Since those don't go through the
> normal submit_stripe_bio callpath but through raid56_parity_recover thus
> repair bios won't have their device set.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4857863.FCrPRfMyHP@liv/
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index e7600b0fd9b5..c6824d0ce59d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -2822,6 +2822,9 @@ static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
>  zeroit:
>  	btrfs_print_data_csum_error(BTRFS_I(inode), start, csum, csum_expected,
>  				    io_bio->mirror_num);
> +	if (io_bio->dev)
> +		btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(io_bio->dev,
> +					     BTRFS_DEV_STAT_CORRUPTION_ERRS);
>  	memset(kaddr + pgoff, 1, len);
>  	flush_dcache_page(page);
>  	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);

Any chance you could do a follow up merging that weird zeroit label 
into the memset() block?

It kind of disturbs the reading flow of that function and in fact it 
doesn't even zero the data




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux