Re: [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: Increment device corruption error in case of checksum error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/2/20 8:23 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Now that btrfs_io_bio have access to btrfs_device we can safely
increment the device corruption counter on error. There is one notable
exception - repair bios for raid. Since those don't go through the
normal submit_stripe_bio callpath but through raid56_parity_recover thus
repair bios won't have their device set.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/4857863.FCrPRfMyHP@liv/
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index e7600b0fd9b5..c6824d0ce59d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -2822,6 +2822,9 @@ static int check_data_csum(struct inode *inode, struct btrfs_io_bio *io_bio,
  zeroit:
  	btrfs_print_data_csum_error(BTRFS_I(inode), start, csum, csum_expected,
  				    io_bio->mirror_num);
+	if (io_bio->dev)
+		btrfs_dev_stat_inc_and_print(io_bio->dev,
+					     BTRFS_DEV_STAT_CORRUPTION_ERRS);
  	memset(kaddr + pgoff, 1, len);
  	flush_dcache_page(page);
  	kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
--
2.17.1


I had to go look this up to see if we were double counting, but no, we only do BTRFS_DEV_STAT_CORRUPTION_ERRS for data with scrub, which goes through a different IO path than the normal reads. Just in case anybody else is as confused as I was

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Josef



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux