Re: [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: convert block group refcount to refcount_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:24 PM Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I was experimenting with some new allocator changes and I noticed that I
> was getting a UAF with the block groups.  In order to help figure this
> out I converted the block group to use the refcount_t infrastructure.
> This is a generally good idea anyway, so kill the atomic and use
> refcount_t so we can get the benefit of loud complaints when refcounting
> goes wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

Looks good and the patch compiles and works just fine here on the
latest misc-next.
Thanks.

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 8 ++++----
>  fs/btrfs/block-group.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> index 09b796a081dd..7c0075413b08 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
> @@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 orig_flags)
>
>  void btrfs_get_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
>  {
> -       atomic_inc(&cache->count);
> +       refcount_inc(&cache->count);
>  }
>
>  void btrfs_put_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
>  {
> -       if (atomic_dec_and_test(&cache->count)) {
> +       if (refcount_dec_and_test(&cache->count)) {
>                 WARN_ON(cache->pinned > 0);
>                 WARN_ON(cache->reserved > 0);
>
> @@ -1805,7 +1805,7 @@ static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_block_group_cache(
>
>         cache->discard_index = BTRFS_DISCARD_INDEX_UNUSED;
>
> -       atomic_set(&cache->count, 1);
> +       refcount_set(&cache->count, 1);
>         spin_lock_init(&cache->lock);
>         init_rwsem(&cache->data_rwsem);
>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->list);
> @@ -3427,7 +3427,7 @@ int btrfs_free_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
>                 ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list));
>                 ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->io_list));
>                 ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
> -               ASSERT(atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1);
> +               ASSERT(refcount_read(&block_group->count) == 1);
>                 btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
>
>                 spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.h b/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
> index b6ee70a039c7..705e48050163 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.h
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct btrfs_block_group {
>         struct list_head list;
>
>         /* Usage count */
> -       atomic_t count;
> +       refcount_t count;
>
>         /*
>          * List of struct btrfs_free_clusters for this block group.
> --
> 2.24.1
>


-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux