On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 07:45:07AM +0800, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2020/7/2 上午4:14, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:30:25AM +0800, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> This looks like an old fs with some bad accounting numbers.
> >
> > Yeah, but it's not.
> >
> >> Have you tried btrfs rescue fix-device-size?
> >
> > Why would I want to try this?
>
> Read the man page of "btrfs-rescue".
Well, nothing in there explains why I should use it in my situation, or
what it has to do with the problem I reported, so again, why would I want
to do this?
Also, shouldn't btrfs be fixed instead? I was under the impression that
one of the goals of btrfs is to be safe w.r.t. crashes.
The bug I reported has very little or nothing to with strict checking.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schmorp@xxxxxxxxxx
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
