On 26/06/2020 14:55, David Sterba wrote: [...] > This leaves 2 bytes (one u16) unaligned to the next 4 bytes, which > shouldn't be a problem, but I think having the csum_size would be a good > and also getting rid of the gap. > >> __u8 reserved[974]; /* 50 974 */ >> >> /* size: 1024, cachelines: 16, members: 9 */ >> }; Good idea, will update and post a v3.
