Re: [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: Introduce btrfs_inode_lock()/unlock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 01:34:05PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 6/25/20 7:34 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > On 18:19 24/06, David Sterba wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:20:13AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> >>> From: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> btrfs_inode_lock/unlock() acquires the inode->i_rwsem depending on the
> >>> flags passed. ilock_flags determines the type of lock to be taken:
> >>>
> >>> BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED - for shared locks, for possible parallel DIO
> >>> BTRFS_ILOCK_TRY - for the RWF_NOWAIT sequence
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@xxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>>  fs/btrfs/ctree.h |  8 ++++++++
> >>>  fs/btrfs/file.c  | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>>  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>> index 161533040978..346fea668ca0 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> >>> @@ -2953,6 +2953,14 @@ void btrfs_update_ioctl_balance_args(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> >>>  			       struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_args *bargs);
> >>>  
> >>>  /* file.c */
> >>> +
> >>> +/* ilock flags definition */
> >>> +#define BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED	0x1
> >>> +#define BTRFS_ILOCK_TRY 	0x2
> >>
> >> Please use enums and add them to a new file inode.h.
> > 
> > These are bitwise flags.
> 
> I suspect that in that case it's more common to do:
> 
> #define BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED	(1 << 0)
> #define BTRFS_ILOCK_TRY 	(1 << 1)

Yeah, that looks more clear that it's meant for bitwise operations.

We don't have any other enum for bitwise flags so define is ok for now.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux