Re: [PATCH] btrfs: pass checksum type via BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/06/2020 14:21, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> So the answer could go both ways, but this doesn't mean we shouldn't
> strive to build better/more robust interfaces.

By changing the reserved16 field to a version, we could have both. I
just don't think there's much value add here.
 
After Hans spoke up, I favor the flags field, as it's more flexible and
puts less assumptions on user-space. If the flag is set, field X is valid.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux