On 2020/6/18 下午8:16, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 18/06/2020 14:09, Qu Wenruo wrote: >>> I find that try_ naming uneasy. If you take the example from locking >>> for instance, after a successful mutex_trylock() you still need to call >>> mutex_unlock(). >> >> Yep, I have the same concern, although no good alternative naming. > > Yeah, there's only two hard things in computer science, cache coherency, > naming things and off-by-one errors. > Best meme of the day!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
