Re: Is SATA ALPM safe with btrfs now (no more corruption)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:26:15PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> TLP allows SATA power management: SATA_LINKPWR_ON_BAT=max_performance
> 
> There are some old posts that talk about corruption if you enable this
> with btrfs:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/TLP#Btrfs
> says not to enable it
> 
> https://forum.manjaro.org/t/btrfs-corruption-with-tlp/25158
> 
> https://github.com/linrunner/TLP/issues/128
> says it may not be safe
> 
> https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/5tm5uh/btrfs_and_tlp/
> also talks about corruption
> 
> https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/4f5xvh/saving_power_is_the_btrfs_dataloss_warning_still/
> say it's probably ok
> 
> My feeling is that it's probably ok nowadays with a 5.6+ kernel.
> 
> Would anyone disagree?

I don't and reading the posts, it's a hardware problem leading to
filesystem corruption. It's affecting all filesystem but the detection
capabilities differ, so it stuck with btrfs.

At least the Arch wiki note can be removed, I don't see any value
keeping it there, the fixes to ATA subsystem have been merged to 4.15.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux