Re: btrfs-progs reports nonsense scrub status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/5/20 3:36 pm, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This was fixed in 5.2.1. I'm not sure why you're seeing this.
> 
> commit 96ed8e801fa2fc2d8a99e757566293c05572ebe1
> Author: Grzegorz Kowal <grzegorz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Sun Jul 7 14:58:56 2019 -0300
> 
>     btrfs-progs: scrub: fix ETA calculation

Maybe not fixed under all conditions!  :)

> What I would do is cancel the scrub. And then delete the applicable
> file in /var/lib/btrfs, which is the file that keeps track of the
> scrub. Then do 'btrfs scrub status' on that file system and it should
> say there are no stats, but it'd be interesting to know if Total to
> Scrub is sane.

$ sudo btrfs scrub status /home
UUID:             85069ce9-be06-4c92-b8c1-8a0f685e43c6
	no stats available
Total to scrub:   7.31TiB
Rate:             0.00B/s
Error summary:    no errors found

> You can also start another scrub, and then again check
> status and see if it's still sane or not. If not I'd cancel it and
> keep troubleshooting.

$ sudo btrfs scrub status -d /home
UUID:             85069ce9-be06-4c92-b8c1-8a0f685e43c6
scrub device /dev/sda (id 1) status
Scrub started:    Thu May  7 15:44:21 2020
Status:           running
Duration:         0:06:53
Time left:        9:23:26
ETA:              Fri May  8 01:14:40 2020
Total to scrub:   3.66TiB
Bytes scrubbed:   45.24GiB
Rate:             112.16MiB/s
Error summary:    no errors found
scrub device /dev/sdb (id 2) status
Scrub started:    Thu May  7 15:44:21 2020
Status:           running
Duration:         0:06:53
Time left:        9:24:50
ETA:              Fri May  8 01:16:04 2020
Total to scrub:   3.66TiB
Bytes scrubbed:   45.12GiB
Rate:             111.88MiB/s
Error summary:    no errors found

Still sane after cancelling and resuming.

One thing that might be relevant:  On the original scrub, I started it
on the mountpoint but initially cancelled and resumed it on the device
/dev/sda rather than the mountpoint.  Could that trigger a bug?

Cheers,
	Andrew



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux