Re: very poor read / write performance compared to other FS's?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:33:35PM +0100, Marek Fstump wrote:
> I am very interested in using BTRFS for my solution but in basic tests
> it seems to be very poor on read and write performance.  I am
> surprised by this so suspect that maybe I am doing something
> incorrectly or that there are updates I should be using, but I am not
> sure how I update BTRFS on SLES11

Hey Marek, just fyi that the btrfs version in sles11 sp1 is old (by btrfs
standards :). That's not surprising of course as btrfs isn't supported yet
in any enterprise distributions. My guess is that you should see better
results with a more recent kernel.
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux