On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 09:05:33AM +0100, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 4:38 PM <fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When cleaning pinned extents right before deleting an unused block group,
> > we check if there's still a previous transaction running and if so we
> > increment its reference count before using it for cleaning pinned ranges
> > in its pinned extents iotree. However we ended up never decrementing the
> > reference count after using the transaction, resulting in a memory leak.
> >
> > Fix it by decrementing the reference count.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Fixes: fe119a6eeb6705 ("btrfs: switch to per-transaction pinned extents")
>
> And missed that in v2, but had it in v1.
Patch updated, thanks.
