very poor read / write performance compared to other FS's?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

I am very interested in using BTRFS for my solution but in basic tests
it seems to be very poor on read and write performance.  I am
surprised by this so suspect that maybe I am doing something
incorrectly or that there are updates I should be using, but I am not
sure how I update BTRFS on SLES11

Summary:
RESULTS on link below
SLES11 SP1
Compared Sequential read/write performance against XFS and OCFS2
Backend storage – FusionIO SLC SSD = circa 750MBsec

Tests  set as follows:
Filesystem contains 30 x 4GB files (made of random data)
Read tests will read from 1 to 30 files concurrently
Write tests will write 1 to 30 concurrent NEW files (simple 000’s)
dd -direct flag used on writes

All defaults used for mounting etc.

Results shown in attachment.

BTRFS looks an excellent FS and perfect for my application and I am
hoping that there are some factors that I am missing
and would appreciate any advice / help

Graph is here (Thank you ‘cwillu’)

http://cwillu.com/files/btrfs/read-write_perf.pdf

Marek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux