On 15.04.20 г. 18:14 ч., David Sterba wrote: > There's no NULL check as mentioned in the changelog, or do you mean to > make it explicit that there's no NULL check? The docs of > read_cache_page_gfp say it returns ERR_PTR so I consider it clear > enough. The changelog wording confuses me a bit, but otherwise the patch > looks good. Yes I wanted to make it explicit why I'm not checking for NULL.
