CACook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Clearly. Please continue the discussion in a debian or grub forum.. > > It really has nothing to do with btrfs. > > No thanks. This is a BTRFS problem, and if you people don't want to > face it, that's fine. A problem that happens when you use btrfs is not neccessarily a btrfs problem. Do I agree that it sucks that distributions make assumptions about filesystems? Yes certainly! Is that a problem for btrfs, and others? Yes. Is it a problem *in* btrfs? Not the least. It's also not something that can be dealt with in this forum, where the topic is the code that implements btrfs. > I'm tearing out BTRFS and using another filesystem. In your situation this seems like an excellent choice. > And rest assured, I'm warning others too. That would be great! Warn others that btrfs is still experimental. Please also warn people to make backups, even if they are not using btrfs. And remember to warn people that the debian+grub combination seems to make assumptions about filesystems. You will do everyone a great service! //Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
