[PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Add missing annotation for btrfs_tree_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sparse reports a warning at btrfs_tree_lock()

warning: context imbalance in btrfs_tree_lock() - wrong count at exit

The root cause is the missing annotation at btrfs_tree_lock()
Add the missing __acquires(&eb->lock) annotation

Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/locking.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index 571c4826c428..850fae45a8a4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ void btrfs_tree_read_unlock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
  * The rwlock is held for write upon exit.
  */
 void btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
+	__acquires(&eb->lock)
 {
 	u64 start_ns = 0;
 
-- 
2.24.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux