Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs-progs: fix misc-test/029 provide device for mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/26/20 11:46 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:32:09PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
The mount fails with 'file exists' error. Fix it by providing the device
name.

Can you be more specific about the environment where it fails? The test
passes for me.


I am running it as

/btrfs-progs$ make TEST=029\* test-misc
    [TEST]   misc-tests.sh
    [TEST/misc]   029-send-p-different-mountpoints
failed: mount -t btrfs -o subvol=subv1 /btrfs-progs/tests//test.img /btrfs-progs/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/subvol_mnt
test failed for case 029-send-p-different-mountpoints
make: *** [test-misc] Error 1

OR

make test

I wonder if there is any other/better way to run them?



Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/test.sh | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/test.sh b/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/test.sh
index a478b3d26495..e34402d9ec06 100755
--- a/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/test.sh
+++ b/tests/misc-tests/029-send-p-different-mountpoints/test.sh
@@ -19,8 +19,10 @@ run_mayfail $SUDO_HELPER mkdir -p "$SUBVOL_MNT" ||
  run_check_mkfs_test_dev
  run_check_mount_test_dev
+# The sed part is to replace double forward-slash with single forward-slash
+lodev=$(losetup  | grep $(echo $TEST_DEV | sed 's/\/\//\//') | awk '{print $1}')

There's a simpler way to canonicalize a path, eg using readlink or
realpath.


 Err. yep. I will fix.

And I don't see why would two slashes appear in a path. IIRC a path
starting with two slashes is standardized as a network path and
recognized by VFS but why this is a concern for the testsuite?


The mount finds the path given is an image file and tries to add another
loop device to it (as I understand the above error), now I wonder
it should fail in your environment as well. If my understand is only
true.

Thanks, Anand




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux