On Thursday 5 May, 2011 13:40:25 cwillu wrote:
> Could you include the information I asked for previously? (Kernel
> version, output of btrfs fi df and btrfs fi show)
Kernel 2.6.37-2
# btrfs fi df /home
Data, RAID0: total=2.61TB, used=2.47TB
Data: total=8.00MB, used=8.00MB
System, RAID1: total=8.00MB, used=196.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00
Metadata, RAID1: total=6.88GB, used=4.64GB
Metadata: total=8.00MB, used=0.00
# df /dev/sdb
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb 3907029168 2659716272 1242565920 69% /home
# df /dev/sdc
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
udev 1895384 268 1895116 1% /dev
(this doesn't make any sense)
# btrfs fi show
failed to read /dev/sdg
failed to read /dev/sdf
failed to read /dev/sde
failed to read /dev/sdd
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid: 85537aa8-30dc-4f87-ac55-6c8344304184
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 2.47TB
devid 1 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdb
devid 2 size 1.82TB used 1.31TB path /dev/sdc
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
> Defrag is not the same as balancing, and neither is quite the same as
> the balancing of the internal b-trees that make up the filesystem.
I know they're not the same. But I am asking:
I thought balancing was supposed to be automatic in BTRFS?
Is defrag not automatic?
No idea what 'balancing of the internal b-trees' is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
