On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:50:43 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-04-22 06:12:24 -0400: >> Since we have implemented the delayed update of the inode, we can also >> delayed to insert the initial inode, then we can merge the inode update >> and the initial inode insertions to one insertion. > > Awesome. With things separate from the inode this should solve our oom > problems. We might need to register a shrinker for the delayed inode > operations too, but that shouldn't be a problem. I think this shrinker may block the task which is reclaiming the memory, because the shrinker need some free memory to do extent buffer cow when it does delayed item insertion/deletion. So... But don't worry about it, those delayed nodes will be freed after the transaction is committed. Thanks Miao > > -chris > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
