Re: [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: allocate extent state and check the result properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/12/2011 04:14 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> It doesn't allocate extent_state and check the result properly:
> - in set_extent_bit, it doesn't allocate extent_state if the path is not
>   allowed wait
> 
> - in clear_extent_bit, it doesn't check the result after atomic-ly allocate,
>   we trigger BUG_ON() if it's fail
> 
> - if allocate fail, we trigger BUG_ON instead of returning -ENOMEM since
>   the return value of clear_extent_bit() is ignored by many callers
> 

Ping...to see what happened. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux