On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:42:07PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote: > There will be savings in the future, however -- when I add Li's > suggestion for tracking the number of bytes (in the block groups as a > whole, and in terms of useful data stored), plus the vaddr of the > last-moved block group, the size of the btrfs_balance_info struct will > go up from its current 8 bytes to 48. I've just not quite finished > that patch yet, and wanted to get the rest of the patches settled > while I work on the new one... makes sense, no objections. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
