[PATCH 3/4] Btrfs: Fix incorrect inode nlink in btrfs_link()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Link count of the inode is not decreased if btrfs_set_inode_index()
fails.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Singed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/inode.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index b9f7f52..a4157cf 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4846,9 +4846,6 @@ static int btrfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
 	if (inode->i_nlink == ~0U)
 		return -EMLINK;
 
-	btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
-	inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
-
 	err = btrfs_set_inode_index(dir, &index);
 	if (err)
 		goto fail;
@@ -4864,6 +4861,9 @@ static int btrfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir,
 		goto fail;
 	}
 
+	btrfs_inc_nlink(inode);
+	inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
+
 	btrfs_set_trans_block_group(trans, dir);
 	ihold(inode);
 
-- 
1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux